Directors of companies considered as final beneficial owners

Directors of companies considered as final beneficial owners

We already know that a company that prepares its Beneficial Ownership Report (BOI) in accordance with the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) has the obligation to identify each of the members of its board of directors (or directors) as final beneficiaries. Although FinCEN regulations do not require a reporting company to list all members of the board of directors as beneficial owners, there are some practical considerations that should be considered when preparing the report.

According to the CTA law, a company that submits the BOI report must include the identification of each of its beneficial owners. A beneficial owner is any individual who directly or indirectly owns 25% or more of the ownership interest in the company that is issuing the report, or who exercises substantial control over the company. Members of a company’s board of directors do not automatically exercise substantial control by virtue of their role as directors. 

According to the information presented by FinCEN in FAQ D.9, it is expressly stated that a member of the board of directors of a reporting company does not always need to be identified as a beneficial owner. And yet, there is no provision in FinCEN regulations that describes the circumstances under which a director must be identified. The definition of “substantial control” within subsection (c) states that an individual has substantial control (and is therefore a beneficial owner) if this individual “has substantial influence over important decisions made by the reporting company.”

The content of the explanation in FAQ D.9 indicates that “whether a particular director meets any of these criteria [of substantial control] is a question that the reporting company must consider on a director-by-director basis.” This conclusion follows the regulations, but does not give a direct answer to the concept of “substantial influence.” Interpretations that suggest identifying only one board member who has disposition power or veto power create a bright-line test, but are not supported by the regulation.

The regulation does not say that a board member is a beneficial owner only when he has the power to determine or veto an important decision. There is nothing in the regulations that indicates that a “controlling” member of the board of directors is a beneficial owner, but a “passive” member of the board of directors is not. There is no objective way to determine when one director acts independently, while another acts passively. This lack of regulatory guidance is particularly serious when considering the impact that guessing wrong would cause.

In a potentially flawed BOI reporting process, the defendant will argue that he made a serious and judicious estimate of the facts and circumstances. The prosecutor will urge that the same facts simply demonstrate complicity and manipulation of information deliberately carried out by the accused. A defendant who needs to demonstrate the absence of a “deliberate” failure to disclose her case will have difficulty obtaining a pretrial dismissal, even with the strongest documentation in an honest internal decision process.

The lack of an official indication to determine which directors have substantial influence over important decisions implies the need for a conservative approach. If there is no regulatory leeway to exclude a particular director, then the only risk-free rule is one that includes all directors.

Based on this information, we can note that the most prudent approach while submitting a BOI report is to include each member of the board of directors as a beneficial owner.

Suscribe

newlester En
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Some of the services provided through the website www.llccorpcompliance.com may be considered legal services. To the extent that any service provided through the website or associated portal, including, without limitation, the collection of information, the use of the integrated software platform and the submission of reports to a federal government agency, is considered A “legal service” will be provided by Global Business Advisors, LLC (gba.law), through a licensed attorney working for the firm. Currently, attorneys working at gba.law are licensed to practice law in the state of Alabama and can provide services related to Alabama state law and United States federal law. Submission of any form through www.llccorpcompliance.com, payment of any fee and acceptance of the terms and conditions on any form completed through the website or as part of the BOI report management workflow, constitutes your agreement and authorization to the preparation and submission of a BOI report to FinCEN and constitutes your acknowledgment that you have the appropriate authorization to engage the reporting company to retain the services of llccorpcompliance.com for such purposes. Contacting gba.law through www.llccorpcompliance.com or www.gba.law or sending an email to any of our attorneys or staff does not create an attorney-client relationship or obligate gba.law to represent you or provide you with legal services. . We cannot represent you in any legal matter until we have determined that no conflict of interest exists for gba.law and until you agree to the terms of any representation by signing an engagement agreement with the firm. There is no guarantee that the quality of legal services to be provided by gba.law or the attorneys associated with the firm will be better than the quality of legal services provided by other attorneys.
© 2024 LLC Corp Compliance Company. All rights reserved.
319817318 • 11981 • 8918_014_915_6481 • 71427321893 • 28_7_741 •591_718_9181419 • 8887 • 8888 • 777 • 519_7148

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Priorities – FinCEN

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Priorities - FinCEN

The U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has determined its priorities for monitoring and enforcing the law against entities and individuals that fail to comply with their Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting responsibility.

 

FinCEN’s final rule on BOI reporting went into effect on January 1, 2024. FinCEN issued a template for beneficial ownership reporting, and is revising it in response to criticism from Congress and some industry sectors. The CTA requires newly formed reporting companies (as of 2024) to submit their beneficial ownership and company applicant information to FinCEN within 90 days of their formation. For reporting companies formed before January 1, 2024, the deadline to submit beneficial ownership information is December 31, 2024.

 

FinCen stated among its priorities to comply, the following points:

 

  • Review standards for collecting federal claims (31 CFR Parts 900-904).
  • Propose a regulation for the Establishment of National Examination and Supervision Priorities.
  • Propose a regulation for Reports and Records of Real Estate Transactions.
  • Propose revisions to customer due diligence requirements for financial institutions.
  • Issue a final rule for a pilot program on information sharing related to suspicious activity reports within a financial group.
  • Issue a final rule on access to and safeguards for beneficial ownership information and the use of FinCEN identifiers for entities.
  • Initiate a long-term study of Modifications to the Definition of Securities Broker or Distributor (Crowdfunding).
  • Initiate a long-term study on clarifying the requirement to collect, retain and transmit information on transactions involving convertible virtual currencies and digital assets with legal tender status.
  • Initiate a long-term study into the requirements for certain transactions involving convertible virtual currency or digital assets.
  • Begin a long-term study of Section 6110 of the Bank Secrecy Act involving antiques and arts dealers.
  • Initiate a long-term study of commercial real estate transaction reports and records.

 

The BOI Data that FinCEN collects from CTA reporting companies will be retained in a “Beneficial Ownership Secure System” or “BOSS” database. FinCEN issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with respect to how various parties would access the BOSS (the “Access Rule“). Both industry advocates and Congressional sources criticized the Access Rule and FinCEN acknowledged that criticism, promising to change its approach. FinCEN has not yet issued a new NPRM with respect to the Access Rule.

 

A key aspect of the CTA was that the BOSS was supposed to be “highly useful” to banks and financial institutions, who are currently required to collect beneficial ownership information from their customers under a separate set of regulations under the Bank Secrecy Act. 31 CFR 230. FinCEN issued regulations to harmonize the CTA’s beneficial ownership information requirements with banks’ beneficial ownership data collection obligations under its Customer Due Diligence Rule. FinCEN’s latest announcement confirmed that the Reporting Rule has already gone into effect on January 1, 2024.

Suscribe

newlester
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Some of the services provided through the website www.llccorpcompliance.com may be considered legal services. To the extent that any service provided through the website or associated portal, including, without limitation, the collection of information, the use of the integrated software platform and the submission of reports to a federal government agency, is considered A “legal service” will be provided by Global Business Advisors, LLC (gba.law), through a licensed attorney working for the firm. Currently, attorneys working at gba.law are licensed to practice law in the state of Alabama and can provide services related to Alabama state law and United States federal law. Submission of any form through www.llccorpcompliance.com, payment of any fee and acceptance of the terms and conditions on any form completed through the website or as part of the BOI report management workflow, constitutes your agreement and authorization to the preparation and submission of a BOI report to FinCEN and constitutes your acknowledgment that you have the appropriate authorization to engage the reporting company to retain the services of llccorpcompliance.com for such purposes. Contacting gba.law through www.llccorpcompliance.com or www.gba.law or sending an email to any of our attorneys or staff does not create an attorney-client relationship or obligate gba.law to represent you or provide you with legal services. . We cannot represent you in any legal matter until we have determined that no conflict of interest exists for gba.law and until you agree to the terms of any representation by signing an engagement agreement with the firm. There is no guarantee that the quality of legal services to be provided by gba.law or the attorneys associated with the firm will be better than the quality of legal services provided by other attorneys.
© 2024 LLC & Corp Compliance Company. All rights reserved.
319817318 • 11981 • 8918_014_915_6481 • 71427321893 • 28_7_741 •591_718_9181419 • 8887 • 8888 • 777 • 519_7148

Risks of reporting BOI without legal advice

Risks of reporting BOI without legal advice

One of the most important aspects to consider within the new Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) are the risks of reporting the Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) without proper legal advice. Even the United States Department of the Treasury within the Financial Crimes Control Network warns public accountants to be careful when preparing BOI reports, which poses a significant risk in the event that company shareholders do so by themselves or without the support of a lawyer knowledgeable on the subject.

Who is considered a declarant in BOI reports?

Section 380(g)(1) of the Reporting Rule provides that the “person” filing a BOI report may be an individual, a company, or another entity. FinCEN includes in this concept the fact that any person whom the reporting company authorizes to act on its behalf (an employee, the owner or a third-party service provider), can file a BOI report on behalf of the reporting company.

From a risk-reducing perspective, it is very important to consider that the company administrator should be the person who authorizes and files the BOI report with FinCEN with the proper advice of an attorney or legally supported organization.

Who assumes the legal responsibility for filing a BOI report?

Section 380(g)(4) states that: “if a person fails to report complete or updated beneficial ownership information to FinCEN, with respect to an entity: (i) such entity is required [by law] to report information to FinCEN, (ii) the reporting company does not report such information to FinCEN, and (iii) such person causes the failure or is a senior official of the entity at the time of the failure.”

This means that responsibility for information that was requested (but not reported or was reported with errors) falls on the senior management of the reporting company and on any person who “caused the failure.” The phrase “caused failure” can apply to a person who provides false information or refuses to provide accurate information required in the BOI report.

Additionally, when we refer to the Frequently Asked Questions published by FinCEN in what corresponds to question K.3, it clearly explains two specific points:

  1. Can a person who files a report on behalf of a reporting company be held liable?

    Yes. A person who knowingly files a false or fraudulent beneficial ownership information report on behalf of a company may be subject to the same civil and criminal penalties as the reporting company and its senior officials

  2. Can a beneficial owner or company applicant be held liable for refusing to provide required information to a reporting company?

    Yes. As described above, an enforcement action may be brought against a person who intentionally causes a reporting company to fail to submit complete or updated beneficial ownership information to FinCEN. This would include a beneficial owner or company applicant who intentionally fails to provide required information to a reporting company.

And the consequences of completing a BOI report without qualified legal advice could cause economic damage, as FinCEN also recognizes in question K2. What penalties do individuals face for violating BOI reporting requirements? As specified in the Corporate Transparency Act, a person who intentionally violates the BOI reporting requirements may be subject to civil penalties of up to $500 for each day the violation continues. However, the amount of this civil penalty is adjusted annually for inflation. At the time of publishing this FAQ, this amount is $591.

A person who intentionally violates BOI reporting requirements may also be subject to criminal penalties of up to two years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Potential violations include intentionally failing to file a report of beneficial ownership information, intentionally filing false beneficial ownership information, or intentionally failing to correct or update previously reported beneficial ownership information.

Conclusion

Any natural or legal person can be a “filer” of a BOI report. Considering this, it is extremely important that the “filer” be legally advised by a certified professional or by an organization that specializes in legally advising business owners, partnerships, corporations and subsidiary companies.

Suscribe

newlester
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Some of the services provided through the website www.llccorpcompliance.com may be considered legal services. To the extent that any service provided through the website or associated portal, including, without limitation, the collection of information, the use of the integrated software platform and the submission of reports to a federal government agency, is considered A “legal service” will be provided by Global Business Advisors, LLC (gba.law), through a licensed attorney working for the firm. Currently, attorneys working at gba.law are licensed to practice law in the state of Alabama and can provide services related to Alabama state law and United States federal law. Submission of any form through www.llccorpcompliance.com, payment of any fee and acceptance of the terms and conditions on any form completed through the website or as part of the BOI report management workflow, constitutes your agreement and authorization to the preparation and submission of a BOI report to FinCEN and constitutes your acknowledgment that you have the appropriate authorization to engage the reporting company to retain the services of llccorpcompliance.com for such purposes. Contacting gba.law through www.llccorpcompliance.com or www.gba.law or sending an email to any of our attorneys or staff does not create an attorney-client relationship or obligate gba.law to represent you or provide you with legal services. . We cannot represent you in any legal matter until we have determined that no conflict of interest exists for gba.law and until you agree to the terms of any representation by signing an engagement agreement with the firm. There is no guarantee that the quality of legal services to be provided by gba.law or the attorneys associated with the firm will be better than the quality of legal services provided by other attorneys.
© 2024 LLC & Corp Compliance Company. All rights reserved.
319817318 • 11981 • 8918_014_915_6481 • 71427321893 • 28_7_741 •591_718_9181419 • 8887 • 8888 • 777 • 519_7148

The Dissolution of Companies and the Corporate Transparency Law

The Dissolution of Companies and the Corporate Transparency Law

A frequently asked question when discussing the new Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is whether an entity that is dissolved before December 31, 2024 would still be required to submit an information report on its beneficial owners (BOI). This question is very important.

If a dissolved entity ceases to be a “reporting company” such that it no longer has a duty to file a return, then any reporting company that is no longer active could dissolve before the end of 2024 and no longer have a duty to file a report statement. However, if the CTA requires all existing reporting companies in early 2024 to file (regardless of whether they are dissolved), then dissolution will most likely not end the company’s legal liability.

What is dissolution?

One of the challenges is that each state defines and treats dissolution differently. Even within a single state, there may be multiple types of dissolution proceedings and different proceedings for different types of entities. For this reason it is very important to seek help from a competent attorney to review and be sure to comply with all the requirements of state laws.

There is no final rule for BOI reporting regarding the question of whether or not a dissolved entity is exempt from its BOI reporting obligation. It should be understood that specific real-world scenarios may arise during implementation that require additional clarification.

Regarding companies that dissolve during the year 2024, it must be tacitly recognized that the dissolution of an entity means the end of its corporate existence and the elimination of its obligation to submit a BOI report.

The importance of Competent Legal Advice

Lawyers who have studied these provisions have sometimes reached different conclusions. In conclusion, one could say that an entity that has been dissolved under its state law so that it no longer has legal existence, should be exempt from the obligation to file a BOI report. Because there is no specific regulation in this regard, lawyers of companies that are advising with this obligation must be careful when advising their clients who do not need to submit the BOI report.

We must consider that, if the entity does not exist, it cannot have a senior official authorized to submit a request. Once an entity is completely and permanently dissolved, it has no senior officials. However, entities that have simply filed a “notice of dissolution” or any precursor filing that begins the liquidation process, still have legal existence. Even if this legal existence is limited to the activities required for liquidation and dissolution. Therefore, entities that have some form of legal existence must submit the BOI report in due time.

For this reason, it is important that companies have professional legal advice to prepare their reports.



Suscribe

newlester
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Some of the services provided through the website www.llccorpcompliance.com may be considered legal services. To the extent that any service provided through the website or associated portal, including, without limitation, the collection of information, the use of the integrated software platform and the submission of reports to a federal government agency, is considered A “legal service” will be provided by Global Business Advisors, LLC (gba.law), through a licensed attorney working for the firm. Currently, attorneys working at gba.law are licensed to practice law in the state of Alabama and can provide services related to Alabama state law and United States federal law. Submission of any form through www.llccorpcompliance.com, payment of any fee and acceptance of the terms and conditions on any form completed through the website or as part of the BOI report management workflow, constitutes your agreement and authorization to the preparation and submission of a BOI report to FinCEN and constitutes your acknowledgment that you have the appropriate authorization to engage the reporting company to retain the services of llccorpcompliance.com for such purposes. Contacting gba.law through www.llccorpcompliance.com or www.gba.law or sending an email to any of our attorneys or staff does not create an attorney-client relationship or obligate gba.law to represent you or provide you with legal services. . We cannot represent you in any legal matter until we have determined that no conflict of interest exists for gba.law and until you agree to the terms of any representation by signing an engagement agreement with the firm. There is no guarantee that the quality of legal services to be provided by gba.law or the attorneys associated with the firm will be better than the quality of legal services provided by other attorneys.
© 2024 LLC & Corp Compliance Company. All rights reserved.
319817318 • 11981 • 8918_014_915_6481 • 71427321893 • 28_7_741 •591_718_9181419 • 8887 • 8888 • 777 • 519_7148